🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 296+ reviews
Vintage✓ In Stock🔥 Bestseller

Vintage 1986 Designer Laurel Burch “Rainbow Cats” Cloisonné Enamel 18” Necklace

★★★★★4.8 out of 5(296 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$65
$108.33
Sale
✓ gratis dispatch on this item • Limited time offer

Vintage 1986 Designer Laurel Burch “Rainbow Cats” Cloisonné Enamel 18” Necklace

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
express shipment
↩️
effortless Returns

📋 Product Description

Vintage 1986 Designer Laurel Burch “Rainbow Cats” Cloisonné Enamel 18” Necklace

Vintage 1986 Designer Laurel Burch “Rainbow Cats” Cloisonné Enamel 18” Necklace

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 308758

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Necklaces

Original Price:$108.33 USD

Sale Price:$65 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 distribution & Returns

✓ complimentary delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.8
★★★★★
Based on 296 reviews
NP
Nathan Phillips ✓ Verified
1 month ago
★★★★★
superb Vintage 1986 Designer Laurel Burch “Rainbow Cats” Cloisonné Enamel 18” Necklace!
Honestly, the Vintage 1986 Designer Laurel Burch “Rainbow Cats” Cloisonné Enamel 18” Necklace works as described and I don’t regret it.
MR
Matthew Robinson ✓ Verified
1 month ago
★★★★★​
fantastic Quality
After assorted use, the Vintage 1986 Designer Laurel Burch “Rainbow Cats” Cloisonné Enamel 18” Necklace does its job so no complaints.
BT
Brittany Turner ✓ Verified
2 months ago
★★★★★
premier Purchase Ever
After a few use, the Vintage 1986 Designer Laurel Burch “Rainbow Cats” Cloisonné Enamel 18” Necklace works fine so no complaints.
JA
Joshua Allen ✓ Verified
4 weeks ago
★★★★★
remarkable Quality
After various use, it feels okay and it meets expectations.
AP
Adam Parker ✓ Verified
3 weeks ago
★★★★★
incredible Quality
To be fair, it works fine which is good enough.​